Here’s That 4 Page Mind Frame Persuasion Influence Freebie: The Power Of “Shared Action Verbs” To Massively Pre-Frame Your Prospect To Believe Your Ever Word Is True!
Dear MindFrame Persuasionists,
Ok; here is the promised link to the 4page snippet from my never published book on MindFrame Copywriting(R).
You know, I am actually sad I put this away in 2006.
There is GREAT stuff in here.
These 4 pages discuss just ONE concept, but that concept alone I think is applicable for ANY kind of persuasion, and not just that in print.
Tomorrow I think I’ll do a special video/power point presentation expanding on the need to get your subjects/audience/prospects to willingly suspend their disbelief, so you by-pass all of their skepticism and get straight to the child-like, easily convinced part of who they are.
But only if you tell me what you think of this freebie.
Here is the link.
Tell me what you think below, after you’ve read the 4 pages. How do you think the concept of Shared Action Verbs could improve your business/marketing/sales/persuasion bottom line?
Peace, piece and persuade pervasively,
RJ
P.S. This is fun, isn’t it?


9. April 2009 at 4:25 pm :
We trust you as an NLP teacher, like you always say, there are a lot of fakers out there and con artists so It would be great to learn “general” persuasion techniques from you.
9. April 2009 at 5:56 pm :
Depotentiate - to take energy away from the part of their mind that’s going to be skeptical and continue to energize their imagination by implying it so they don’t resist.
Ross,
I’d like to learn more about how to depotentiate using the tool of implication.
So how are you going to drop this wisdom on us?
What other tools to you have?
Eric
9. April 2009 at 6:24 pm :
Ross,
The material is great, but it’s pretty dense. I think for broader consumption organizing it based upon structured development from simplest elements would make it easier for more people to absorp.
9. April 2009 at 10:36 pm :
Ross,
First thing, you should consider changing the outsourced Asian transcripting service you were using;
Second, this dialogue is very “a little bit of a mouthful” and chaotic, and the same information could be fit it 2 pages or less.
Otherwise, it seems interesting. However, as English is not my native tongue, I would have to invent Polish equivalents of VOVs if I were to use it. I will give it a try though.
Piece and peas,
Mike
10. April 2009 at 2:25 am :
It makes alot of sense and i can see how this works so well when your script is not subtle and you can use very action based text to blow the script up in the readers face…………its a cool way to excite the mental juices of a reader this is a nugget of gold and on its own can transform sales letters and emails alone never mind copywriting, i’ve seen some john carlton and frank korn stuff and this is better. Actually there is a little Harlan Kilstein in here im sure haha!
10. April 2009 at 10:30 am :
the great thing about very useful material is thatyou can apply it to any area of life. As i was reading i came to this conclusion: most people dont know how o talk..they dont have a clue!! Me included. but thanks to SS and this amazing new twist in Ross´ teachings i am glad to see im learning incredible powerful stuff and how to talk with a clear direction and a goal in mind. Ross, this is awesome!!! keep going
10. April 2009 at 2:04 pm :
Loved it, Ross. Lots of my marketing is so focused on the reader (”you” this, and “you” that), that I was missing opportunities to connect through shared experience. I think the “you” marketing has been so overdone that people are starting to resist it, and the “we” approach got me so excited that I revised one of my sales pages to test it out. Thanks, man!
11. April 2009 at 12:18 am :
Motherfucking Value!!!
12. April 2009 at 1:26 pm :
“As we explore this amazing world of persuasion today, I just want you to know that it really excites me to be sharing knowledge that powerfully transforms lives. And I’m not sure just which of these tools will excite you the most but as that’s happening let’s get started.”
As we experience revivified, presuppositional amazement together by the end of the antecedent clause, becuase we have experinced this amazement together, and, becuase an exploration denotes a future activity, it means we can get really excited about exploring this AMAZING world of persuasion togther in the future, and this is truly trance-formational.
How trance-formational? Well, on the one hand, most people have heard the Indian proverb, “that which can be thought is not real” Yet, on the other hand, most people have seen an mri, cat scan,pet scan, eeg and the like. So, it looks like ideas are real. People even speak as if ideas are “things.” Someone will even say they “got” their idea from so and so. Or someone will say someone “gave” someone an idea. But, really when you think about it, why, oh great trance-form of difference, if ideas are objects, is it so easier for them to get around, while the rest of us have to figure how we are going to get from a to b, ideas, like a rumor have already beat us across town?